Fox ([info]skullfaced) wrote,
@ 2009-07-12 19:11:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood: on my soapbox
Entry tags:rant, stuff

From an email I sent Dargon:

"By anti-consumerist, I'm not saying everyone has to purge their possessions down to what they can fit in a 130 square foot Home That Is Mobile. But I am saying that owning five Rolexes or seven Gucci bags when you don't ever use them is just stupid. If you wear a watch, and you want to spend a lot of money on one, that's fine. But buy one, and use the fuck out of it. Don't buy five and let them collect dust. N. has a damn sixty dollar purse she bought because "it's so cute!" but she never uses it. "I don't have anything that matches it!" Well, she shouldn't have bought it then.

"Pimping one's computer isn't excessive. You use it. Fuck, if I had the money, mine would be pimped out, too. We play video games, we need nice(r) computers. But having the best computer on the damn block is stupid if you only use it to browse Myspace. Most people would find the amount I spend on cat food excessive. Yes, I could very well feed them Meow Mix and they would be happy. But I prefer to spend the extra money on a better food sourced in the US and sold by an independent retailer. And while it's expensive, I'm not paying for a label. The ingredients are quality. I'm not paying a premium for a corn-based pet food (*coughcough*Eukanuba*coughcough*ScienceDiet).

"My anti-consumerist rally is against people like the woman shown in the movie. Bought her kids not one, not two, but THREE fucking my-size Hummers. She buys them brand-name clothing. They'll grow out of the clothing in six months, and in a few hours they'll be playing with the box those my-size Hummers came in. Instead of actually taking care of her kids, instead of giving them what they need, instead of *loving* and *enjoying* her children, she throws money at them. Like a person who gets a dog, buys it the most expensive of everything, but doesn't play with it and doesn't interact with it. This is why I don't need a dog. I like the idea of a dog. I don't necessarily like the reality of a dog. Unless it happens to be a very certain Pomeranian. But that's not a dog, that's my niece.

"If you spend money on something, you'd better damn well love it and enjoy it and get some use out of it, no matter how much you paid for it. That's pretty much what it boils down to."




(5 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]scarlet_foxx
2009-07-13 12:39 am UTC (link)
well said!

(Reply to this)


[info]stainedfeathers
2009-07-13 12:42 am UTC (link)
Nice rant

(Reply to this)


[info]angeljapan
2009-07-13 02:48 am UTC (link)
Amen. I am working my best on that.

(Reply to this)


[info]kittikattie
2009-07-13 09:03 am UTC (link)
Agreed. I do have a lot of stuff but I use it--or try to. Which is why I have a bajillion books and only two pairs of shoes in rotation.

(Reply to this)

See...
[info]bardkris
2009-07-13 05:10 pm UTC (link)
Sometimes I agree with your rants, but sometimes they just seem like silly naive communism. Sadly, the world is too large for naive communism to work as more than a gesture.

This one was the former, but I don't want you to get complacent with all the positive feedback.

On a more personal note, this is basically the Romani concept of ownership as it was taught to me. You only own something if you're using it. If it's not being used, it's free for whoever wants it.

(Reply to this)


(5 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…